Anonymized count of properties in each assessment growth band.
Election Ward 9 is part of Aldermanic District 3 (Wards 7, 8, 9). Contact your alderperson with ward-level concerns about assessments, infrastructure, or Open Book process questions.
Who / What / Where / Why prompts for Ward 9 โ based on verified community submissions, not an official city audit.
Who can explain why 5 verified community submissions in Ward 9 show a median increase of +86.0% compared with the 69% citywide benchmark โ and whether any ward-specific valuation factors drove outliers?
What actions will council take if 80% of participating Ward 9 properties report increases above the 69% benchmark, while the ward weighted aggregate change is +79.3%?
Where in Ward 9 are homeowners seeing the largest concentration of above-benchmark increases, and will the city request targeted assessor review for those blocks before Board of Review closes?
Why does the arithmetic mean increase (+85.9%) differ from the weighted aggregate (+79.3%) in Ward 9, and how should council message that difference so residents do not confuse percentage averages with total tax-base shifts?
Who represents Ward 9 on council, and will you host a ward listening session before October Board of Review so residents can share record-card errors and infrastructure issues tied to their assessments?
What transparency will the city provide on levy decisions this fall so Ward 9 owners know whether their relative tax share change reflects assessment shifts, budget votes, or both?